Skip Navigation

Continuing Education in Anaesthesia, Critical Care & Pain 2008 8(1):1-4; doi:10.1093/bjaceaccp/mkm052
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow CME/CE:
Take the course for this article:
CEACCP, Volume 8 – Issue 1, Febr...
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Nunn, G.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow Articles by Nunn, G.
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


© The Board of Management and Trustees of the British Journal of Anaesthesia [2008]. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oxfordjournals.org

Low-flow anaesthesia

Geoffrey Nunn, BA (Hons) FRCA
Geoffrey Nunn BA (Hons) FRCA
Consultant Anaesthetist
United Leeds Teaching Hospitals
Leeds LS1 3EX UK

Tel: +44 (0)113 392 6672 Fax: +44 (0)113 392 2645 E-mail: geoffrey.nunn@leedsth.nhs.uk

Key Words: The equipment required to deliver safe anaesthesia with low fresh gas flow rates is already standard in the UK. • Low-flow anaesthesia is characterized by economy in the use of anaesthetic agents and reduced atmospheric pollution. • As the carrier gas flow rate is reduced, an increasing disparity develops between the fresh gas and the inspired gas mixtures. The fresh gas composition increasingly needs to reflect the patient's uptake of its components. • A progressive reduction in a practitioner's gas flow rates permits safe and relaxed self-learning of this technique. • Both compound A and carbon monoxide are produced to a significant extent only in CO2 absorbents containing potassium hydroxide. No such absorbents remain in commercial production.

The first 150 words of the full text of this article appear below.

Modern inhalational anaesthetic agents are metabolized to a small extent only and are largely exhaled unchanged. The use of breathing systems fitted with carbon dioxide absorption units and comprehensive gas monitoring permits the exploitation of this to perform economical and safe ‘low-flow anaesthesia’.

There is no universally accepted definition of low-flow anaesthesia, though it certainly implies a carrier gas flow less than that attainable with a non-absorber breathing system. Baum's suggestion of ‘a rebreathing fraction of greater than 50%’ gives too high a figure,1 since it is at a rebreathing fraction above 75% that the special characteristics of low-flow anaesthesia become apparent. A technique for nitrous oxide–oxygen anaesthesia with a gas flow of 1 litre min–1 was described by Foldes in 1952.2 He sought to define safe nitrous oxide–oxygen mixtures for patients of different weights in the absence of oxygen monitoring. He drew attention to the fact that as the . . . [Full Text of this Article]


    Characteristics of low fresh gas flow techniques
 

    Requirements for the use of low-flow techniques
 

    Advantages of low-flow techniques
 
Economy

Climatization

Pollution


    Disadvantages of low-flow techniques
 
Limitations of currently available vaporizers

Accumulation of unwanted gases in the breathing system

Substances exhaled by the patient

Contaminants of medical gases

Products of reactions with absorbents


    Future developments
 

Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?